 |
BEST Roma
Board of European Students of Technology |
Evaluation SC '99
|
| SC2000 Main page | LBG Home | ||
|
|
||
Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
at the threshold of
the new millenium
25 partecipants
21 responders
| All data except averages are percentages. For [yes/no] questions, the average lies between 1 (100% no) and 2 (100% yes). For [very bad... very good] questions, the average lies between 1 (100% very bad) and 5 (100% very good). Non-answered questions are not considered in computing averages |
|
| ||
| Academic Part | Social Part | Organization & Organizers |
|
| ||
The academic part
1a) How was the available information about
the Course (leaflet) before you decided to apply for it? {average=3.99, OK=9.52, good=61.9, very good=23.8, no answer=4.76} 1b) Did the practical information (Info Kit) arrive to you in time after you were accepted to the course,
i.e. at least 3 weeks before the course?
{average=1.9, yes=90.47, no=9.52} 1c) How was the information before the course, after you were accepted
{average=4.28, OK=19.04, good=33.33, very good=47.61} 2) How was the English level of the teachers?
{average=4.9, good=9.52, very good=90.47} 3) How was the presentation of the lectures?
{average=4.9, good=9.52, very good=90.47} 4) Was the course difficult?
{average=1.04, yes=4.76, no=95.23} 5a) Did you ask questions to the teacher?
{average=1.61, yes=61.9, no=38.09} 5b) If you did, did you get satisfactory answers?
{average=1.34, yes=61.9, no answer=38.09} 6) Were there any excursions related to the course topics?
{average=2.0, yes=100.0} 7a) How do you consider the number of lecture hours (including visits, discussions, etc) ?
{average=4.57, OK=9.52, good=23.8, very good=66.66} 7b) Did you have any practical/laboratory sessions?
{average=1.42, yes=42.85, no=57.14} 8) Did you have access to the necessary facilities for the academical part of the course
(this could be computers if you needed to write a report, or access to a library if you needed literature, etc.) ?
{average=1.66, yes=80.95, no answer=14.28}
|
|
The social part
9a) Were you satisfied with the planned
schedule? {average=2.0, yes=100.0} 9b) How were you satisfied with keeping the schedule?
{average=4.23, OK=23.8, good=28.57, very good=47.61}
|
|
The organizational part and the organizers
10) How were you
satisfied with the accommodation? {average=4.47, OK=9.52, good=33.33, very good=57.14} 11a) Were you, generally, satisfied with the provided food?
{average=2.0, yes=100.0} 11b) Breakfast
{average=3.23, bad=19.04, OK=57.14, good=4.76, very good=19.04} 11c) Lunch
{average=4.47, OK=9.52, good=33.33, very good=57.14} 11d) Dinner
{average=4.61, good=38.09, very good=61.9} 12) How was your communication with the organizers
{average=4.61, OK=9.52, good=19.04, very good=71.42} 13) How were you satisfied with the diversity of the participants' nationalities?
{average=4.76, OK=4.76, good=14.28, very good=80.95} 14) How was your relation with the other students during the course?
{average=4.8, good=19.04, very good=80.95} 15a) What is your evaluation of social activities?
{average=4.61, good=19.04, very good=76.19, no answer=4.76} 16) How were you satisfied with the acceptance of your own cultural identity by the other students?
{average=4.71, OK=4.76, good=19.04, very good=76.19} 17) Would you like to participate in other programs organized by BEST?
{average=1.92, yes=95.23, no answer=4.76} 18) Would you be interested in working with BEST organizing such programs?
{average=1.74, yes=80.95, no=9.52, no answer=9.52}
|
|
| Last update: 1/04/00 | | | webmaster |
| SC2000 Main page | | | LBG Home |